Lithuanian MEPs have split opinion over EU refugee plan

The European Commission‘s plan was supported by Liberal MEPs Petras Auštrevičius and Antanas Guoga, conservative Algirdas Saudargas and Social Democrats Zigmantas Balčytis ir Vilija Blinkevičiūtė.

Among those who voted against the proposed scheme were leaders of the Order and Justice party, the Labour Party and the Electoral Action of Poles in Lithuania, Rolandas Paksas, Valentinas Mazuronis and Valdemar Tomaševski.

The leader of Lithuania’s conservatives, MEP Gabrielius Landsbergis, Bronis Ropė of the Peasant and Greens Party and the Labour Party’s Viktor Uspaskich did not attend the meeting.

Landsbergis’ adviser Jonas Survila told BNS that the MEP could not be present at the extraordinary meeting, adding that he “would have supported the party’s position and voted in support”.

Related Post

Mazuronis, who voted against the plan, said it did not benefit Lithuania and Europe, making the most critical remarks about the proposed penalty amounting to a “financial contribution” of 0.002 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP) for countries refusing to participate in the resettlement scheme.

“The commission’s proposal, which includes mandatory distribution of refugees and quotas by way of the penalty system, is I think wrong and will not lead to solution but, instead, to arm wrestling and unnecessary tensions within the EU, which may cause strengthening of Euro-sceptical forces. This will definitely not lead to solution to the refugee crisis, quite the opposite – it will escalate the willingness of refugees to make way to any EU country,” Mazuronis told BNS.

Meanwhile Auštrevičius referred to the results as to “a politically correct decision,” which will demonstrate Europe’s solidarity and willingness to ease the burden for Hungary, Italy and Greece.

“I am not saying this is the final and permanent distribution mechanism. EU politicians may not be ready for such decision yet. Let it be a decision that shows a solution, not just sighing about the problem,” he said to BNS.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Foreign affairs

“No need to mince words”: an assessment of what Trump’s victory means for Lithuania

"We can shout very loudly, but it won't change the position of the American people,"…

2 weeks ago
  • Latest

Lies, disrespect and mockery: experts assess Blinkevičiūtė’s “gift” to voters without scruples

From mocking messages flooding social networks to harsh criticism from political experts, the decision of…

3 weeks ago
  • Foreign affairs

Another year in the sovereign history of Kazakhstan

Republic Day has been celebrated in Kazakhstan as the main national date since 2022, giving…

4 weeks ago
  • Defence

In the assessment of NATO’s readiness for war with Russia, there is also a warning about the Baltic states: what is the Kremlin’s wild card?

According to Lrytas.lt, the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) faces a new geopolitical reality with…

4 weeks ago
  • Tribune

The Citus projects: The Kaip Niujorke by CITUS project continues – the spirit of New York unfolds in Vilnius, and the second phase is launching

In September, Citus – a creative real estate projects’ development and placemaking company – began…

4 weeks ago
  • Latest

These parties will enter the Seimas for the third time in a row. How many votes did they lose, and how many did they gain?

As various parties emerge, disappear or reorganize themselves in the political space, the Lithuanian Social…

1 month ago