Parliament endorses resolution blaming Constitutional Court for violating rights of impeached president Paksas

In its resolution, the Commission blamed the “insidious practices” of Lithuania’s Constitutional Court which had banned Paksas from ever running for elected office again.

Paksas was impeached and removed from the presidency in 2004 for grave violations of the Constitution. The Constitutional Court later ruled that Paksas would not be allowed to hold any public office that required giving an oath. Paksas challenged the decision at the ECtHR, which ruled in 2011 that the life-long ban was excessive.

The ad hoc commission at the Lithuanian parliament probed why the ECtHR ruling in the case “Paksas against Lithuania” had not been implemented. It claimed that the reasons behind this were the “insidious practices” of the Constitutional Court whose institutional acts it claimed were limiting the rights of the legislature and its assumed powers and prerogatives, and that it said were not defined in the Law on the Constitutional Court.

According to the ad hoc commission, the state is obliged to grant effective remedies to Paksas and to revise the life-long ban preventing him from participating in presidential elections or holding the positions of prime minister or minister.

The commission suggested that the Seimas review the provisions of the Law on the Constitutional Court and define anew its place in the country’s governance system.

Related Post

The Commission has also put forward proposals to reassess the legal regulation of the impeachment process and to establish a body that would review impeachment decisions.

The Commission’s findings also state that the Seimas have the power to reinstate former president Paksas’ civic and political rights if three-fifths of all MPs support the motion. It said the Seimas can also decide how long the sanction against Paksas to participate in parliamentary elections may apply.

The commission, headed by Kęstas Komskis of Paksas’ own Order and Justice party, began its work in spring 2014 and presented its conclusions the following autumn. However, the conclusions only reached the Seimas now and was endorsed in a vote of 61 to 27, with 15 abstentions.

Last week, the Seimas failed to adopt amendments that would have limited sanctions for impeached officials to 10 years.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Tribune

Historical novel by Kazakh writer Ermek Tursunov “Mamluk”in Lithuanian language presented in Vilnius

On the eve of the Independence Day of the Republic of Kazakhstan, on December 13,…

23 hours ago
  • Foreign affairs

After Nausėda meeting with Budrys, the opposition retorts to the candidate’s “cooling off “

Kęstutis Budrys, the President's Senior Adviser, who has been nominated for the post of Minister…

4 weeks ago
  • Tribune

Rediscover Bulgaria’s Ancient Heritage: Plovdiv’s Restored Eastern Gate and Nebet Tepe

In the heart of Bulgaria, the city of Plovdiv reveals a rich tapestry of ancient…

4 weeks ago
  • Foreign affairs

“No need to mince words”: an assessment of what Trump’s victory means for Lithuania

"We can shout very loudly, but it won't change the position of the American people,"…

1 month ago
  • Latest

Lies, disrespect and mockery: experts assess Blinkevičiūtė’s “gift” to voters without scruples

From mocking messages flooding social networks to harsh criticism from political experts, the decision of…

2 months ago
  • Foreign affairs

Another year in the sovereign history of Kazakhstan

Republic Day has been celebrated in Kazakhstan as the main national date since 2022, giving…

2 months ago