Parliament endorses resolution blaming Constitutional Court for violating rights of impeached president Paksas

In its resolution, the Commission blamed the “insidious practices” of Lithuania’s Constitutional Court which had banned Paksas from ever running for elected office again.

Paksas was impeached and removed from the presidency in 2004 for grave violations of the Constitution. The Constitutional Court later ruled that Paksas would not be allowed to hold any public office that required giving an oath. Paksas challenged the decision at the ECtHR, which ruled in 2011 that the life-long ban was excessive.

The ad hoc commission at the Lithuanian parliament probed why the ECtHR ruling in the case “Paksas against Lithuania” had not been implemented. It claimed that the reasons behind this were the “insidious practices” of the Constitutional Court whose institutional acts it claimed were limiting the rights of the legislature and its assumed powers and prerogatives, and that it said were not defined in the Law on the Constitutional Court.

According to the ad hoc commission, the state is obliged to grant effective remedies to Paksas and to revise the life-long ban preventing him from participating in presidential elections or holding the positions of prime minister or minister.

The commission suggested that the Seimas review the provisions of the Law on the Constitutional Court and define anew its place in the country’s governance system.

Related Post

The Commission has also put forward proposals to reassess the legal regulation of the impeachment process and to establish a body that would review impeachment decisions.

The Commission’s findings also state that the Seimas have the power to reinstate former president Paksas’ civic and political rights if three-fifths of all MPs support the motion. It said the Seimas can also decide how long the sanction against Paksas to participate in parliamentary elections may apply.

The commission, headed by Kęstas Komskis of Paksas’ own Order and Justice party, began its work in spring 2014 and presented its conclusions the following autumn. However, the conclusions only reached the Seimas now and was endorsed in a vote of 61 to 27, with 15 abstentions.

Last week, the Seimas failed to adopt amendments that would have limited sanctions for impeached officials to 10 years.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Culture

Lens on Movement: Ukrainian and Lithuanian Photos at Luxembourg’s European Mobility Week

Celebrating the European Mobility Week (16-22 September), the City of Bissen in Luxembourg will present…

3 days ago
  • Economy

Lithuanians will have to open their wallets even wider: goods and services will become more expensive

According to TV3.lt, Swedbank economists raise their GDP growth forecast for Lithuania and believe the…

1 week ago
  • Economy

Janulevičius. Lithuania’s economy looks better than Estonia’s or Latvia’s, but we shouldn’t be happy about it

From Q1 2022 onwards, Estonia has been in a prolonged recession. Yes, we also had…

2 weeks ago
  • Tribune

EMBank’s earnings for the first half of 2024 have increased by over 50%

European Merchant Bank (EMBank), a provider of financial solutions to small and medium-sized businesses, has…

2 weeks ago
  • Latest

Resorting to anger when it should be apologising: experts on Gabrielius Landsbergis

As the debate on the Landsbergis' assets continues in the public sphere, political analysts are…

2 weeks ago
  • Economy

Preliminary housing purchase contract – what not to be afraid of and what to check before signing

A preliminary contract is usually signed when buying a new dwelling directly from the developer…

1 month ago