Vilnius communities should have a say on heritage protection plans, court rules

A court ruled last week that by denying the public access to the Vilnius Old Town Real Estate Heritage Protection (Administration) Plan, the Cultural Heritage Department violated the Aarhus Convention which ensures public right to information and public participation during the environmental planning processes.

Vilnius communities filed a lawsuit against the department last October after it refused to share details of the plan it was putting together.

“The Board of Judges ruled that the historical centre of Vilnius Old Town is a World Heritage Site with a special historic and cultural value. The local residents and visitors have a right to enjoy a unique cityscape, therefore the Department of Cultural Heritage was obliged to satisfy the applicants’ request and provide them with all the necessary information as it is stated in the Aarhus Convention. The Board also noted that, according to the Aarhus Convention’s objectives and its explanatory documents, the Convention grants the public with the right to access all the information about any stage of the territorial planning and development. The governmental institutions must provide access to the information about how the developments will affect their living environment, in this case, the historical centre of Vilnius,” Vilnius District Administrative Court said in comment of its May 9 ruling.

The court also said that the Aarhus Convention, which was signed by the UN Economic Commission for Europe and ratified by Lithuania, is effectively a Lithuanian law and takes precedence over national laws that might contradict it.

Related Post

Jūratė Markevičienė, representative of the Public Organisation of Žvėrynas Community, said:

“We are glad that 15 years after the ratification of Aarhus Convention by the Seimas and 11 years after the Convention became part of the ES Environmental Law, Lithuania acknowledged that the Convention is applicable to the heritage environments as well. At the same time it is a shame that our institutions had to be forced to acknowledge it only through courts. European heritage and Aarhus Convention specialists were always astounded by the reluctance of Lithuanian institutions of cultural heritage protection to acknowledge people’s right to their environment whenever the cases of heritage or historic sites are in question.”

Locomotive.press information.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Tribune

Historical novel by Kazakh writer Ermek Tursunov “Mamluk”in Lithuanian language presented in Vilnius

On the eve of the Independence Day of the Republic of Kazakhstan, on December 13,…

4 days ago
  • Foreign affairs

After Nausėda meeting with Budrys, the opposition retorts to the candidate’s “cooling off “

Kęstutis Budrys, the President's Senior Adviser, who has been nominated for the post of Minister…

1 month ago
  • Tribune

Rediscover Bulgaria’s Ancient Heritage: Plovdiv’s Restored Eastern Gate and Nebet Tepe

In the heart of Bulgaria, the city of Plovdiv reveals a rich tapestry of ancient…

1 month ago
  • Foreign affairs

“No need to mince words”: an assessment of what Trump’s victory means for Lithuania

"We can shout very loudly, but it won't change the position of the American people,"…

2 months ago
  • Latest

Lies, disrespect and mockery: experts assess Blinkevičiūtė’s “gift” to voters without scruples

From mocking messages flooding social networks to harsh criticism from political experts, the decision of…

2 months ago
  • Foreign affairs

Another year in the sovereign history of Kazakhstan

Republic Day has been celebrated in Kazakhstan as the main national date since 2022, giving…

2 months ago