President Obama challenges critics on historic nuclear deal with Iran

Mr. Obama has been on a major offensive selling this deal as the best solution to his main critics in Israel and US Congress. The president challenged his critics to alternatives, if any, to ensure that Iran will not engage in a nuclear arms race.

During a one-hour press conference, President Obama confronted his critics and the press head-on, preempting many of the questions they may have had. President Obama said: “I challenge those who are objecting to this agreement to read it, and to explain specifically where it is that they think that this agreement does not prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon.” He added, “and if the alternative is that we should bring Iran to heel through military force, then those critics should say so.” Nevertheless he expects, “the debate to be robust”, given the national security implications for the USA.

One of the many objections of the Republicans relate to the access for verification and time it takes to get access. This was brushed aside by Mr. Obama: ”the nature of nuclear programs and facilities is such, this is not something you hide in a closet. This is not something you put on a dolly and kind of wheel off somewhere.” He reminded the audience of their high school physics: ”Nuclear material on a site leaves a trace.”

Related Post

Rather than dealing with broader issues of Iran’s role in the Middle East, the President stated that the agreement focussed on preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. He also called one American journalist’s suggestion that the deal should have been tied to release of Americans in Iranian prisons as “nonsense”, given the complexity of the deal and its implications.

Vice President Joe Biden was also out on Wednesday meeting members of Congress and convincing them to back the deal described by the White House as “historic”. The success of this deal will be a large part of President Obama’s legacy, as he stated “it’s important for everybody to remember the alternative and the fundamental choice that this moment”. The president threatened on Tuesday that any blocking by Congress would be meet with a presidential veto. Such a veto would require two-thirds opposition in both the House of Representatives and Senate to overturn.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Tribune

Historical novel by Kazakh writer Ermek Tursunov “Mamluk”in Lithuanian language presented in Vilnius

On the eve of the Independence Day of the Republic of Kazakhstan, on December 13,…

3 days ago
  • Foreign affairs

After Nausėda meeting with Budrys, the opposition retorts to the candidate’s “cooling off “

Kęstutis Budrys, the President's Senior Adviser, who has been nominated for the post of Minister…

1 month ago
  • Tribune

Rediscover Bulgaria’s Ancient Heritage: Plovdiv’s Restored Eastern Gate and Nebet Tepe

In the heart of Bulgaria, the city of Plovdiv reveals a rich tapestry of ancient…

1 month ago
  • Foreign affairs

“No need to mince words”: an assessment of what Trump’s victory means for Lithuania

"We can shout very loudly, but it won't change the position of the American people,"…

2 months ago
  • Latest

Lies, disrespect and mockery: experts assess Blinkevičiūtė’s “gift” to voters without scruples

From mocking messages flooding social networks to harsh criticism from political experts, the decision of…

2 months ago
  • Foreign affairs

Another year in the sovereign history of Kazakhstan

Republic Day has been celebrated in Kazakhstan as the main national date since 2022, giving…

2 months ago