“What I discovered in Kaunas is that the heritage values are much more than single monuments or isolated monuments. It’s the whole urban ensemble, continuity of architecture, of landscape, of fabric, of intangible elements, the spirit of the city,” Jad Tabet told BNS during his visit to Lithuania’s second-biggest city this week.
“I think this is very important — I think this should be the basis of the value that should be expressed for the inscription of Kaunas into the World Heritage List,” he said.
In Tabet’s words, what makes Kaunas’ modernism unique is that it was integrated into existing architecture, rather than trying to break with traditional styles.
“The specificity that is very interesting in Kaunas is that modernism was not based on rupture. If you look at, for example, modernism in Western Europe, architecture modernism — and not only architecture — cultural modernism was always based on rupture with the past: Bauhaus architecture is rupture with traditional historic styles, modern art is based on rupture,” the expert said.
“In the case of Kaunas, modernism is more based on a sort of continuity. There’s no rupture. The interwar period architecture was inserted into the urban grid that had existed since the 19th century. It respected the grid, it respected the landscape, it didn’t come and break the whole thing,” Tabet said.
“Also, it integrated local styles, elements — this is very interesting, it is very peculiar, it is the specificity of the Kaunas interwar period,” he added.
Municipal officials said after meeting with Tabet that his comments and remarks are very helpful as Kaunas prepares to apply for listing on the Tentative List of UENSCO World Heritage Sites. The city’s application is now being finalized and is planned to be submitted in around a month’s time.