The current situation of Lithuanian manufacturing is assessed better than future prospects. Why?

Dr Mantas Vilkas. Photo KTU

A few years ago, Continental and Hella established production sites in Lithuania. Some months ago, Yazaki announced the closure of the plant in Lithuania. It is worth looking more closely at what determines the decisions of global manufacturing companies to establish or close factories.

Manufacturing companies in Lithuania generate up to 20% of the gross domestic product. As the service sector shrank during the pandemic, manufacturing companies increased their volumes, guaranteeing a stable income for their employees and contributions to the state budget.

The favour of the regions for the development of productive activities is important

Lithuania is dominated by the belief that the readiness of manufacturing companies to compete in the context of Industry 4.0 is determined by their level of digitization. The level of digitization is very important. Digital technologies allow reducing operating costs and increasing value for customers. However, future opportunities are also determined by the country’s characteristics and region where manufacturing activity takes place.

The World Economic Forum evaluates countries according to their ability to compete in the context of Industry 4.0 (WEF, 2018). Each country is evaluated according to 200 criteria, assessing the current manufacturing situation and the factors that determine the future prospects of production. According to the current production situation, Lithuania ranks 31st out of 100 evaluated countries, and according to the future prospects of production – 37th place. According to the current situation, Latvia and Estonia are in 49th and 34th place, according to future possibilities – 38th and 27th. This is a good assessment of the Baltic countries. However, the current situation in Lithuania is assessed better than the future prospects – let’s examine why.

Low R&D costs are a systemic problem in Lithuania

The main factors complicating Lithuania’s production potential are a weak domestic demand environment, low R&D expenditures, and a vague structure of the future workforce. When choosing the location of a new factory, foreign companies assess the level of domestic demand. Being close to consumers is becoming increasingly important, and customers want goods faster and faster. Some products, such as food, are difficult to transport over long distances. The Baltic States have a population of 6 million. With a population of 38 million, Poland will always be in the eyes of investors and the largest competitor of the Baltic States for manufacturing investments.

Low R&D costs are a systemic problem in Lithuania. The level of R&D expenditure perfectly describes the country’s innovative environment. In 2019, the level of R&D in Lithuania was 0.99% of GDP, while Estonia contributed 1.4% and Latvia 0.6% of GDP. Israel (4.9%), the USA (2.8%) and China (2.1%) spend the most on R&D. The EU average pf R&D spending is 2%.

The structure of the future workforce complicates the opportunities of Lithuanian manufacturing companies. The Baltic countries have lost a large population. Lithuania lost 23.8% of its population since the highest estimates in 1990, Estonia 19.2% and Latvia 25.5%. In addition, the popularity of engineering sciences in the country is a headache. According to the availability of scientists and engineers, Lithuania ranks 52nd, Estonia 43rd and Latvia 92nd out of 100 evaluated countries. Finally, the professions required by manufacturing companies are not popular in vocational training institutions.

Lithuania is not lagging behind in applying digital technologies

The main factors driving the industry are high involvement in global and regional supply chains, the degree of use of digital technologies, and the economy’s complexity.

Baltic companies export over 65% of their production. A large number of manufacturing companies are involved in regional or global supply chains, where products manufactured in the Baltic States are used in further production processes. Some of the products are supplied to end customers in other countries. Such involvement in supply chains is beneficial for manufacturing companies because it is necessary to maintain a high level of efficiency, coherence and operational transparency. Companies that supply products to end customers are in an even better position. They are the first to learn about the changing needs of consumers. They are also able to supplement their products with product support and customer support services generating additional income.

The Baltic countries have a well-developed digital infrastructure, but the level of digitization of production companies is uneven. Managers of Lithuanian (27th place out of 100) and Estonian (16th place out of 100) production companies positively evaluate the application of digital technologies in their activities. Meanwhile, Latvian (60 out of 100) manufacturing companies are less positive and comparative studies confirm these results. Lithuanian manufacturing companies do not lag behind other EU countries in the application of digital technologies. True, small and medium-sized enterprises experience significantly more challenges to digitizing their operations compared with large enterprises.

The Lithuanian market economy, which has been operating for 30 years, is characterized by extensive complexity. The complexity of economic activity shows the diversity of exported products by assessing how many countries are able to produce such products. Therefore, the indices of economic complexity show the diversification of the country’s economy. The complexity of Lithuania’s economic activity ranks 29th, Latvia 35th and Estonia 23rd out of 100 countries evaluated.

Industry 4.0 opportunities – pandemic, Brexit, digital skills development

Lithuania needs to address the obstacles, take advantage of the COVID-19 pandemic and Brexit, and continue to invest in higher value-added production and digital skills development.

The COVID-19 pandemic, Brexit, the unrest in the surrounding countries offers a unique opportunity to increase the active labour force in the country. In the near future, we will certainly not be able to equal Poland in terms of population, but we need to increase the size of the working-age population. In the light of unfavourable demographic trends, it is necessary to form the image of Lithuania as an open country supported by a favourable migration policy. It is naive to expect direct investment by manufacturing companies while having dim prospects for the future workforce.

However, the most important thing is to move to higher value-added production by performing outsourced production activities and product and technological process development functions. This requires increased investment in R&D, the promotion of engineering sciences and increasing digitization skills.

Increased investment in R&D redistributed through the higher education and government sectors, which currently stand at only 0.56% of GDP, is needed. Good nationwide digital infrastructure, appropriate investments in digital technologies in companies create preconditions for increasing the pace of digitalization. The New Generation Lithuania plan presented by the government could contribute to the accelerating digitization of manufacturing companies.

Today, many students choose the social sciences, and it can be difficult to reverse this trend. However, universities and colleges must not appeal to students. Therefore, in addition to the knowledge and skills of the field, the study programs of business and management of universities and colleges must also develop the knowledge and skills of applied statistics and business information systems. In this way, all graduates will have the knowledge needed to push digitalization.

Mantas Vilkas is a researcher of the project “Industry 4.0 Impact on Management Practices and Economics (IN4ACT)”, a professor of KTU School of Economics and Business.

You may like

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*