“We’ll either reject the veto or adopt a similar law. The president is robbing our time as we will have to do the same thing,” he told BNS Lithuania on Wednesday.
He reiterated that he would propose to the parliament to reject the presidential veto and later turn to the Constitutional Court for it to issue its clarification regarding the adopted amendments by the spring of 2019 when a dual citizenship referendum is planned.
Earlier in the day, the Lithuanian president vetoed the amendments the Referendum Law as potentially running counter to the country’s Constitution.
The president underlined that she’s in favor of granting dual citizenship to a larger number of people but invited Lithuanians across the world to get together for legalizing such a possibility in a way that does not raise constitutional doubts.
In late June, the Seimas of Lithuania adopted the amendments to Article 7 of the Referendum Law, thus lowering the threshold for the referendum on amending Article 12 of the Constitution, which is connected to citizenship.
According to the current provisions of Article 7(3) of the Referendum Law, more than half of the citizens having the right to vote and having been registered on electoral rolls would have to approve the amendments to Article 12 of the Constitution to deem them adopted. The amendments to Article 7(3) of the Referendum Law would determine that the decision to amend Article 12 of the Constitution would be deemed adopted if it was approved by more than half of the turnout in the referendum but not less than one-third of the citizens having the right to vote and having been registered on electoral rolls.
The president believes the parliament’s proposal to specifically lower the threshold for a citizenship referendum from 1.25 million to 840,000 votes raises constitutional doubts and thus is very risky.
Karbauskis says the president’s decision is hard to understand as the parliament had already planned to turn to the Constitutional Court for clarification.
“In this case, the president herself decided to be the Constitutional Court. (…) The Constitutional Court would have put a period on this issue,” Karbauskis said.
He hopes the Constitutional Court would issue its clarification before the referendum which is planned alongside presidential elections.
The presidential office says the results of a referendum held based on the amended law are likely to be later quashed in court and deemed void and null. In that case the expansion of dual citizenship would be postponed indefinitely.
The adopted amendments have been criticized by parliamentary lawyers and some lawmakers who say they will create a dangerous precedent and facilitate changes to other constitutional articles.
As a precaution, the Seimas plans to turn to the Constitutional Court in the fall regarding the constitutionality of the adopted amendments.
Lithuanians living all over the world had asked to adopt the amendments on the legalization of dual citizenship, fearing that, otherwise, a referendum on dual citizenship would fail.
Under a plan, such a referendum could be held alongside presidential elections next year.
Currently, people who left Lithuania after it regained independence in 1990 cannot hold dual citizenship, apart from a few exceptions. That provision can only be amended by referendum.
The Constitutional Court has ruled that dual citizenship cannot be a common phenomenon and granting it to people who left Lithuania after it restored independence would run counter to the Constitution.